« Previous | Ain't too proud to blog | mail it | Next »


Posted: 03.14.2002
I can see your panties
So I'm still trying to decide whether the title "Pantie Blog" was a typo, or a double-entendre.....but there seems to be a lot of discussion over at backwash.com about all my "girls! girls! girls!". If you'd like to drop by for a read, and/or give your 2 worth, be my guest!



Hey boy take a look at me...let me dirty up your mind...



First off, to make any potential bias clear I'll state that I also write a column for Backwash.


Using the heading "My Husband Calls It The Pantie Blog" was ambiguous at best, although she does note that aside from the girlie girls which offended her your content is good. I thought it was interesting that somebody pointed out that her title made it the most clicked link today. :)


I agree with your comments. Women shouldn't apologize for being confident with their beauty or sexuality, and you have chosen women who are all noteworthy regardless of their appearance. Some feminists just don't hold with that notion though, and probably the two camps will never agree.


I consider myself what Sam Seaborne labelled Ainsley on the West Wing (I love that I'm certain Robyn will get the reference): a lipstick feminist. I will not tolerate stupid sexism, but neither will I hide my appearance or sexuality. I'm sure we'll reach a happy medium, but the trip has some bumps.


Your skins (and those of Christine and Domesticat) have inspired me to run out and learn PHP. At the end of the day that is that is something you should be proud of.

¤ ¤ credit: jamese | 03.14.02 at 08:29 PM | link--this ¤ ¤

Yep, definitely got the Ainsley reference! She's my favorite character on West Wing (well other than that whole 'Republican' thing)! And I'm very much a lipstick feminist. I took several Womyn's Studies courses in college, and although I took a lot of it to heart, a lot of just couldn't find a place in my core of ideals. I think the beauty in being a woman in this day in age is that you do have those choices available to you, however -- and that is a very good thing!

¤ ¤ credit: robyn | 03.14.02 at 08:37 PM | link--this ¤ ¤

so... when are you gonna make a "panty skin"... or is that an oxymoron?

¤ ¤ credit: mikey | 03.15.02 at 11:34 AM | link--this ¤ ¤

Okay, I'll admit my stupidity. I see the typo, but what is the double-entendre?

¤ ¤ credit: wKen | 03.15.02 at 02:22 PM | link--this ¤ ¤

*pant...pant...pant...drool....drool...drool...* + blog = "pant"ie blog ;-)

¤ ¤ credit: robyn | 03.15.02 at 03:38 PM | link--this ¤ ¤

*slaps self in forhead*

D'oh! I didn't get it either but was too damn proud to ask for help. Thanks wKen and Robyn.

¤ ¤ credit: jamese | 03.15.02 at 04:13 PM | link--this ¤ ¤

*slaps self in forhead particularly savagely*


Apparently I don't know how that complicated "Speak" button works.

¤ ¤ credit: jamese | 03.15.02 at 04:19 PM | link--this ¤ ¤

Wow... I didn't get that either! Duh!

¤ ¤ credit: Susan | 03.17.02 at 02:26 AM | link--this ¤ ¤




URLs that have pinged me for this entry:



All old ping links have been removed from this blog. Die spammers, die!




Hey pretty, don't you wanna take a ride with me through my world?


Psssssst...pass it on!
email this entry to:


your email address:


additional message (optional):