« Previous | Ain't too proud to blog | mail it | Next »


Posted: 02.06.2002
The blog debate
First learned about at Chris Pirillo's -- a new article at ZDNet by John Dvorak about the The online 'Blog' phenomenon. Startling revelations like "these postings are fascinating...blatant exhibitionism and obvious self-indulgence..." and "some people need to be the center of attention...it makes them feel good about themselves to tell the world what important things they've been doing and what profound thoughts they've been having..."



Hey boy take a look at me...let me dirty up your mind...



I along with many read that article, but I'm not sure who else ran into the complaint by a fellow PC Mag reader ...

http://discuss.pcmag.com/n/mb/message.asp?webtag=pcmag&msg=4127.1

I can't agree yet, this is the first article I've read by him ... can't say I'm overly impressed with his "journalistic" abilities or lack thereof...

¤ ¤ credit: a | 02.07.02 at 02:05 AM | link--this ¤ ¤

I gonna cwy. I had that Dvorak link up before most people... yet no one caught it. <boo hoo> no one wuvs me.

¤ ¤ credit: meryl | 02.07.02 at 10:02 AM | link--this ¤ ¤

"Whatever the reason for the Blog phenomenon, it's not going to go away anytime soon. The main positive change: far fewer cat pictures!".....and WHAT, may I ask, is WRONG with cat pictures?!


I hate this guy just for this one paragraph, never mind his entire stupid article!

¤ ¤ credit: beantown-christine | 02.07.02 at 04:11 PM | link--this ¤ ¤




URLs that have pinged me for this entry:



All old ping links have been removed from this blog. Die spammers, die!




Hey pretty, don't you wanna take a ride with me through my world?


Psssssst...pass it on!
email this entry to:


your email address:


additional message (optional):